The closing table, opened.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• An admission by the respondent; the stipulation says the findings and conclusions were neither admitted nor denied except for jurisdiction.
• Conduct by any affiliate, individual agent, broker, employee, owner, or similarly named organization.
• Current conduct after the order's stated relevant period, present compliance, payment or collection of the penalty, consumer loss, or market-wide prevalence.
• That any payment, referral, marketing-services agreement, event, subscription, or commission is unlawful without the exact elements and findings in a controlling record.
• That the $432,000 was a civil penalty, consumer loss, restitution, profit, or amount reported paid to the government.
• That all marketing-services agreements or referral relationships are unlawful.
• An admission, current conduct, or conduct by any person or entity beyond the exact respondent.
• That the order lacks legal force or that the Bureau did not make findings.
• An exoneration, a merits adjudication after a contested hearing, or an admission of the Bureau's findings.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• A court finding, admission, adjudicated liability, or proof that any allegation was true; the later judgment expressly states the opposite procedural posture.
• Current policy, current conduct, current market power, current commission rates, consumer loss, damages, or overcharge.
• Conduct or liability by Covered Entities, multiple listing services, boards, brokerages, members, REALTORS, agents, employees, affiliates, successors, or any person.
• An exoneration, a trial result, a finding that the allegations were true, or an admission of fact, liability, or wrongdoing.
• A merits adjudication arising from section XI's public-interest determination; that section approved entry of the consent judgment, not a trial finding, liability adjudication, or admission.
• That the judgment lacked legal force while effective or that its obligations were optional.
• Any proposition about current conduct, current policies, current compliance, or a separate institution or person.
• That the cited prohibitions remain effective after the judgment's facial expiration on November 18, 2018.
• A requirement to expose MLS records as public data, open data, a public API, or unrestricted access; the judgment addresses bounded VOW delivery of listing information under its own definitions.
• A finding that any current rule, policy, fee, data practice, commission arrangement, or market structure is unlawful.
• Separate conduct, findings, admissions, or liability by any Covered Entity, multiple listing service, board, brokerage, member, REALTOR, agent, employee, affiliate, successor, or person.
• That every required step occurred, when a particular implementation occurred, or the compliance status of any institution.
• A separate action record, finding, admission, or liability for any Covered Entity, multiple listing service, board, brokerage, member, REALTOR, agent, employee, affiliate, successor, or person.
• Any current NAR policy, present MLS data-access condition, commission rate, nationwide market effect, or present legal conclusion.
• Public data, open data, a public API, unrestricted access, or a requirement to expose listing information to people outside the policy's participant and VOW framework.
• That any download occurred, that any institution complied, or that any particular data field was available in practice.
• A present access right or current policy after the judgment's facial expiration, or any current conduct, implementation, compliance, or later action.
• Separate conduct, findings, admissions, or liability by any MLS, Covered Entity, board, brokerage, member, REALTOR, agent, employee, affiliate, successor, or person.
• A trial result, admission, liability finding, damages award, or proof of the complaint's allegations.
• That the proposed instrument was effective before the court entered Document 248 on November 18, 2008.
• Current policy, current conduct, current market conditions, or a legal conclusion about a separate entity or person.
• That any obligation in this ended instrument remains effective after November 18, 2018.
• Present policy, conduct, compliance, market power, corporate continuity, or the absence of a separate later action.
• The appeal status of the judgment; the reviewed DOJ index did not identify an appellate disposition.
• That the index is a complete appellate docket or proves the absence of an appeal or later proceeding.
• A merits finding, admission, current legal effect, current conduct, or current compliance.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• A court finding, admission, adjudicated liability, or proof that any alleged rule, practice, effect, price, steering claim, market statement, or harm statement was true.
• Current rules, present conduct, current commission rates, current market power, consumer loss, damages, or overcharge.
• Conduct, findings, admissions, or liability by member boards, multiple listing services, associations, brokerages, brokers, agents, affiliates, successors, or people.
• That the proposed final judgment was entered, that its proposed terms remain effective, or that any required implementation step occurred.
• An admission of the complaint allegations, a liability finding, a trial result, a monetary award, or an adjudication that the complaint allegations were true or false.
• Current policy, present conduct, present compliance, or any obligation of a separate institution or person.
• A finding that the complaint allegations were true or false, an admission, liability, exoneration, or a ruling on the lawfulness of any rule or practice.
• That a proposed settlement has the same legal status as an entered final judgment.
• The merits, outcome, or current status of any separate investigation, Civil Investigative Demand, appeal, or lawsuit.
• Exoneration, vindication, a defense judgment, a finding that the complaint lacked merit, or proof that any allegation was true or false.
• An admission, liability finding, monetary award, permanent injunction, or final consent judgment.
• Present conduct, current rules, current compliance, or the merits or outcome of a separate later investigation or case.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• A court finding, admission, adjudicated liability, or proof that any allegation, price statement, market statement, harm statement, or correlation was true.
• Current rules, current policy, current conduct, current market power, current commission levels, damages, consumer loss, or overcharge.
• Conduct, findings, admissions, or liability by members, brokerages, brokers, licensees, officers, managers, committees, employees, affiliates, successors, assigns, or any person.
• That the later October 17 recital in the entered judgment is identical to the ECF filing date; the two official instruments differ by one day.
• A merits finding, admission, liability conclusion, current effect, or proven conduct period.
• Which external event caused the one-day difference, or that either instrument may be silently rewritten to match the other.
• A separate action, merits finding, admission, liability conclusion, or conduct date.
• A court finding, trial result, admission, liability determination, or proof that the statement's market, price, harm, or competition descriptions were true.
• That the proposed judgment was an entered final instrument before May 28, 2008.
• Present policy, conduct, market conditions, access rights, compensation levels, or compliance.
• An exoneration, a finding that the allegations were true or false, a trial result, adjudicated liability, or an admission of fact or law.
• That the judgment lacked legal force during its facial term or that its operative obligations were optional.
• Any proposition about current conduct, current rules, current compliance, a separate institution, or any person.
• That any required amendment, notice, acceptance, access, or other implementation step occurred, when it occurred, or that compliance was completed.
• Public data, open data, a public API, unrestricted MLS access, or a present access right after the judgment's facial term.
• Separate conduct, findings, admissions, obligations, or liability for members, brokerages, brokers, licensees, officers, managers, committees, employees, affiliates, successors, assigns, or any person.
• A finding about current rules, policy, conduct, compensation, market power, consumer loss, damages, or overcharge.
• That the full PACER docket contains no modification, extension, enforcement, appeal, or other later action; it was not reviewed.
• That reviewed DOJ or GovInfo search silence proves no later action existed.
• Present entity status, policy, conduct, compliance, market conditions, or legal effect of a separate instrument.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• An admission by the defendant; the entered judgment records a court finding and does not state an admission.
• A separate finding against any unnamed co-conspirator, member, subscriber, title insurer, agent, person, successor, affiliate, or present-day entity.
• Current conduct, current market conditions, present corporate status, criminal liability, fraud, damages, or a consumer-loss amount.
• An admission, consent resolution, jury verdict, criminal judgment, or separate finding about a person or other institution.
• That every allegation, requested remedy, dollar figure, or temporal assertion in the complaint was independently adjudicated.
• That any particular filing was withdrawn, that compliance occurred, that noncompliance occurred, or that a later enforcement action existed.
• A monetary award, consumer refund, current rate, current rule, current violation, or present restriction.
• Separate liability or obligations for a member, subscriber, title insurer, agent, officer, employee, successor, assign, or person.
• The appellate court's complete reasoning, an exact appellate docket number, mandate date, or the absence of any other post-judgment filing.
• Current conduct, current legal effect, present corporate status, a monetary award, or a finding against a separate institution or person.
• A Supreme Court merits ruling, adoption of the lower courts' reasoning, or a new finding of liability.
• Current conduct, current judgment effect, present corporate status, or the absence of a separate later action.
• Present corporate status, current policy, current conduct, compliance, noncompliance, or successor liability.
• That a bounded official-source search is a complete district-court docket or proves no modification, enforcement, or separate later action existed.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• Current policy, current conduct, current market power, current noncompliance, or current order effect.
• Fraud, criminal conduct, nationwide conduct, or unlawful market control beyond the Commission's exact historical findings.
• Conduct or liability by any trade association, owner association, member, broker, agent, affiliate, successor, or similarly named entity.
• An independent appellate adjudication of every policy discussed in the FTC opinion; Realcomp petitioned only as to the Website Policy.
• Current conduct, current market conditions, nationwide effects, or conduct by a separate institution or natural person.
• That the later denial of certiorari was a Supreme Court merits ruling.
• A separate violation, monetary remedy, admission, or finding about conduct after the administrative record.
• That a stay denial alone adjudicates the merits of a later appeal.
• That the order is currently effective or that the institution is currently bound by it.
• A monetary penalty, payment, consumer-relief amount, current violation, or present compliance status.
• Current corporate status, footprint, policies, fees, ownership, membership, or affiliations.
• A Supreme Court merits ruling, adoption of the lower court's reasoning, or a new finding of liability.
• Any current conduct, current order effect, or proposition beyond the procedural disposition.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• A final agency merits finding, adjudicated liability, or an admission that the competitive, purpose, effect, market, or consumer-injury allegations were true.
• Current policy, current conduct, present market power, present listing treatment, current commission rates, consumer loss, damages, or overcharge.
• Conduct or liability by any shareholder, member, broker, agent, affiliate, successor, website, trade association, or person.
• That the complaint allegations were true or false, that every historical fact was admitted or denied, or that any pleaded defense prevailed.
• A law violation, exoneration, dismissal, adjudicated liability, damages, or proof of current policy or conduct.
• Conduct, knowledge, intent, liability, or status of any institution or person other than the exact action-local respondent.
• An admission of a law violation, non-jurisdictional fact, competitive effect, market power, liability, damages, or wrongdoing.
• An exoneration or finding that the complaint allegations were false; the matter ended by consent without a final merits determination.
• Any current conduct, present policy, current compliance, or proposition about a separate institution or person.
• That the ended provisions remain effective after March 20, 2017 or that any present policy or practice is unlawful.
• Completion of any required step, current compliance, monetary relief, public data rights, unrestricted listing access, or a public API.
• Separate conduct or liability by any shareholder, member, broker, agent, affiliate, successor, website, trade association, or person.
• That the March 20 issue date is an exact service or effective date; finality upon service is stated in the separate consent agreement.
• That any order provision remains effective after the fixed termination date or that any present institution is bound by this historical order.
• Current entity status, policy, conduct, compliance, market power, or the absence of a separate later enforcement, modification, or other proceeding.
• An exact service date, exact effective date, or exact consent-signing date; the March 20 order issue date is not substituted for service.
• That the agreement PDF is a complete service, enforcement, modification, compliance, appellate, or corporate-status docket.
• Proof that no later proceeding existed, a merits finding, an admission beyond jurisdictional facts, current order effect, or present conduct.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• An agency merits finding, adjudicated liability, or an admission that the restraint, market, effect, or consumer-injury allegations were true.
• Unlawful market control, criminal conduct, coordination on price, current policy, current conduct, current market power, present commission rates, consumer loss, damages, or overcharge.
• Conduct or liability by the National Association of Realtors, any participant, member, broker, agent, board, affiliate, successor, website, trade association, or person.
• An exact April adoption day, exact May implementation day, or an exact end to every act, effect, agreement, combination, or alleged violation described elsewhere in the complaint.
• Completion, compliance, current policy, current corporate status, or the absence of any separate later policy or action.
• Conduct or liability by a participant, member, broker, agent, board, affiliate, successor, trade association, or person.
• That a proposed October order or complaint was final, issued, served, effective, adjudicated, or unchanged before the final November instruments were reviewed.
• A merits finding, admission, compliance event, current conduct, or proposition about a separate respondent.
• A shared action, identity, liability, or relationship among Information and Real Estate Services, Williamsburg Area Association of Realtors, Realtors Association of Northeast Wisconsin, Monmouth County Association of Realtors, and NNEREN.
• An admission of a law violation, non-jurisdictional fact, competitive effect, market power, liability, damages, or wrongdoing.
• An exoneration or finding that the complaint allegations were false; the matter ended by consent without a final merits determination.
• Any current conduct, present policy, current compliance, or proposition about a separate institution or person.
• That the ended provisions remain effective after November 22, 2016 or that any present policy or practice is unlawful.
• Public data, open data, unrestricted listing access, a public API, or any right outside the order's participant and approved-website framework.
• Completion of any required step, current compliance, monetary relief, or separate conduct or liability by any participant, member, broker, agent, affiliate, successor, website, trade association, or person.
• That the November 22 issue date, the 061128 filename encoding, or the December 1 case-timeline date is an exact service or effective date.
• That any order provision remains effective after the fixed termination date or that any present institution is bound by this historical order.
• Current entity status, policy, conduct, compliance, market power, or the absence of a separate later enforcement, modification, appeal, or other proceeding.
• An exact service date, exact effective date, or exact consent-signing date; the order issue, filename, and case-timeline dates are not substituted for service.
• That the agreement PDF is a complete service, enforcement, modification, compliance, appellate, or corporate-status docket.
• Proof that no later proceeding existed, a merits finding, an admission beyond jurisdictional facts, current order effect, present conduct, or compliance.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• An agency merits finding, adjudicated liability, or an admission that the restraint, market, effect, conspiracy, or consumer-injury allegations were true.
• Unlawful market control, criminal conduct, coordination on price, current policy, current conduct, current market power, present commission rates, consumer loss, damages, or overcharge.
• Conduct or liability by the National Association of Realtors, Monmouth/Ocean Multiple Listing Service, any participant, member, broker, agent, board, affiliate, successor, website, trade association, or person.
• An exact October adoption day, any implementation date, or an exact end to every act, effect, agreement, combination, conspiracy, or alleged violation described elsewhere in the complaint.
• Completion, compliance, current policy, current corporate status, or the absence of any separate later policy or action.
• Conduct or liability by a participant, member, broker, agent, board, affiliate, successor, trade association, or person.
• That a proposed October order or complaint was final, issued, served, effective, adjudicated, or unchanged before the final November instruments were reviewed.
• A merits finding, admission, compliance event, current conduct, or proposition about a separate respondent.
• A shared action, identity, liability, or relationship among Information and Real Estate Services, Northern New England Real Estate Network, Williamsburg Area Association of Realtors, Realtors Association of Northeast Wisconsin, and Monmouth.
• An admission of a law violation, non-jurisdictional fact, competitive effect, market power, conspiracy, liability, damages, or wrongdoing.
• An exoneration or finding that the complaint allegations were false; the matter ended by consent without a final merits determination.
• Any current conduct, present policy, current compliance, or proposition about a separate institution or person.
• That the ended provisions remain effective after November 22, 2016 or that any present policy or practice is unlawful.
• Public data, open data, unrestricted listing access, a public API, or any right outside the order's participant and approved-website framework.
• Completion of any required step, current compliance, monetary relief, or separate conduct or liability by the Monmouth/Ocean Multiple Listing Service, any participant, member, broker, agent, affiliate, successor, website, trade association, or person.
• That the November 22 issue date or the 061128 filename encoding is an exact service or effective date.
• That any order provision remains effective after the fixed termination date or that any present institution is bound by this historical order.
• Current entity status, policy, conduct, compliance, market power, or the absence of a separate later enforcement, modification, appeal, or other proceeding.
• An exact service date, exact effective date, or exact consent-signing date; the order issue and filename dates are not substituted for service.
• That the agreement PDF is a complete service, enforcement, modification, compliance, appellate, or corporate-status docket.
• Proof that no later proceeding existed, a merits finding, an admission beyond jurisdictional facts, current order effect, present conduct, or compliance.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• An agency merits finding, adjudicated liability, or an admission that the restraint, market, effect, combination, consumer-injury, adoption, publication, or amendment allegations were true.
• That the policy was enforced, implemented, or applied to any listing; the action-specific complaint states only what would have occurred if pre-amendment enforcement had happened.
• Unlawful market control, criminal conduct, price coordination, current policy or conduct, present market power or commissions, consumer loss, damages, or overcharge.
• Conduct or liability by WMLS, NAR, any website, participant, member, broker, agent, board, affiliate, successor, trade association, or person.
• An exact 2002 adoption day, an exact June amendment day, any enforcement or implementation date, or an exact end to every alleged act or effect.
• That the amendment or notice occurred exactly as alleged, completed an order requirement, proved compliance, or ended every alleged effect.
• Conduct, admission, finding, or liability by WMLS, its board, a participant, member, broker, agent, affiliate, successor, website, trade association, or person.
• That the policy was enforced, implemented, applied to a listing, or caused a transmission denial.
• That the policy was never enforced; the conditional wording leaves enforcement unestablished in the reviewed final complaint.
• An enforcement start or end date, the identity of any affected listing or consumer, compliance, current conduct, or current policy.
• Erasure of the separate complaint allegation that adoption and publication alone discouraged Exclusive Agency Listings.
• That a proposed October order or complaint was final, issued, served, effective, adjudicated, or unchanged before the final November instruments were reviewed.
• That aggregate phrases such as when implemented establish that Williamsburg enforced or implemented its rule; the action-specific final complaint uses conditional enforcement wording.
• A merits finding, admission, compliance event, current conduct, or proposition about a separate respondent.
• A shared action, identity, liability, or relationship among Williamsburg, IRES, NNEREN, RANW, and Monmouth.
• An adjudicated finding that the policy was or was not implemented, enforced, or applied.
• Proof that no listing was ever excluded or affected, that all IDX feeds were complete, or that every institution or participant complied.
• An exoneration, merits ruling, admission, present policy, present conduct, current compliance, or proposition about a separate respondent.
• An admission of a law violation, non-jurisdictional fact, competitive effect, market power, enforcement, liability, damages, or wrongdoing.
• An exoneration or finding that the complaint allegations were false; the matter ended by consent without a final merits determination.
• Any current conduct, present policy, current compliance, or proposition about a separate institution or person.
• That the ended provisions remain effective after November 22, 2016 or that any present policy or practice is unlawful.
• Public data, open data, unrestricted listing access, a public API, or any right outside the order's participant and approved-website framework.
• Completion of any required step, current compliance, monetary relief, or separate conduct or liability by WMLS, NAR, any website, participant, member, broker, agent, affiliate, successor, trade association, or person.
• Any exact amendment, notice, website, report, or accessibility calendar deadline without an exact service or finality date.
• That a required act was performed, completed on time, violated, excused, modified, or enforced.
• Current compliance, current website content or accessibility, current entity status, or current order effect.
• That the November 22 issue date or the 061128 filename encoding is an exact service or effective date.
• That any order provision remains effective after the fixed termination date or that any present institution is bound by this historical order.
• Current entity status, policy, conduct, compliance, market power, or the absence of a separate later enforcement, modification, appeal, or other proceeding.
• An exact service date, exact effective date, or exact consent-signing date; the order issue and filename dates are not substituted for service.
• That the agreement PDF is a complete service, enforcement, modification, compliance, appellate, or corporate-status docket.
• Proof that no later proceeding existed, a merits finding, an admission beyond jurisdictional facts, current order effect, present conduct, or compliance.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• An agency merits finding, adjudicated liability, or an admission that the alleged adoption, exclusion, restraint, market, effect, combination, consumer injury, or law violation was true.
• Current policy or conduct, present market power or commissions, consumer loss, damages, refund, overcharge, criminal conduct, or price coordination.
• Conduct or liability by RANW MLS, NAR, any website, participant, member, broker, agent, board, affiliate, successor, trade association, or person.
• An admission of the alleged law violation, 2001 adoption, pre-amendment exclusion, market definition, market power, competitive effect, consumer injury, combination, conspiracy, liability, damages, or wrongdoing.
• An agency merits finding, adjudication, exoneration, or finding that the remaining complaint allegations were true or false.
• Any current conduct, present policy, current compliance, current institutional status or relationship, or proposition about a separate institution or person.
• An exact August 31 notice date; the complaint says only on or about that date.
• An admission of the alleged 2001 adoption, exclusion, market, effect, consumer-injury, combination, conspiracy, violation, or liability allegations.
• That the amendment or notice completed an order requirement, proved compliance, ended every alleged effect, or states any present policy or conduct.
• That the alleged 2001 adoption occurred, its exact date, wording, implementation, enforcement, effect, or legality.
• An admission of adoption; the consent identifies jurisdictional and remedial facts only, and excludes other complaint allegations.
• Current policy, present conduct, current market power, liability, consumer injury, damages, compliance, or conduct by another institution or person.
• That a proposed October order or complaint was final, issued, served, effective, adjudicated, or unchanged before the final November instruments were reviewed.
• An admission beyond the final consent's expressly bounded jurisdictional and remedial facts, a merits finding, current conduct, or compliance event.
• A shared action, identity, liability, or relationship among RANW, IRES, NNEREN, Williamsburg, and Monmouth.
• That the ended provisions remain effective after November 22, 2016 or that any present policy or practice is unlawful.
• Public data, open data, unrestricted listing access, a public API, or any right outside the order's participant and approved-website framework.
• Completion of any required step, current compliance, monetary relief, or separate conduct or liability by RANW MLS, NAR, any website, participant, member, broker, agent, affiliate, successor, trade association, or person.
• Any exact amendment, notice, website, report, or accessibility calendar deadline without an exact service or finality date.
• That a required act was performed, completed on time, violated, excused, modified, or enforced.
• Current compliance, current website content or accessibility, current entity status, or current order effect.
• That the November 22 issue date or the 061130 filename encoding is an exact service or effective date.
• That any order provision remains effective after the fixed termination date or that any present institution is bound by this historical order.
• Current entity status, policy, conduct, compliance, market power, or the absence of a separate later enforcement, modification, appeal, or other proceeding.
• An exact service date, exact effective date, or exact consent-signing date; the order issue and filename dates are not substituted for service.
• That the agreement PDF is a complete service, enforcement, modification, compliance, appellate, or corporate-status docket.
• Proof that no later proceeding existed, a merits finding, an admission beyond the stated jurisdictional and remedial facts, current order effect, present conduct, or compliance.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• An agency merits finding, adjudicated liability, or an admission that the alleged adoption, exclusion, restraint, market, effect, combination, consumer injury, or law violation was true.
• Unlawful market control, criminal conduct, price coordination, current policy or conduct, present market power or commission rates, consumer loss, damages, refund, or overcharge.
• Conduct or liability by IRES MLS, NAR, an IRES Website, an owner or member organization, a participant, subscriber, broker, agent, board, affiliate, successor, trade association, or person.
• An exact 2003 adoption date, an exact July rescission date, or an exact end to every alleged act, effect, agreement, combination, or violation.
• That the adoption, rescission, or notice occurred exactly as alleged, completed an order requirement, proved compliance, or states a current policy.
• Conduct, admission, finding, or liability by IRES MLS, an owner, manager, participant, subscriber, member organization, broker, agent, affiliate, successor, website, trade association, or person.
• An admission of the alleged 2003 adoption, listing exclusion, market definition, market power, competitive effect, consumer injury, rescission, notice, combination, conspiracy, law violation, liability, damages, or wrongdoing.
• An exoneration or a finding that the remaining complaint allegations were false; the matter ended by consent without a final merits determination.
• Any current conduct, present policy, current compliance, present entity status, or proposition about a separate institution or person.
• That draft paragraphs 1-7 or 10-29 were jurisdictional, admitted, adjudicated, or true.
• That the JURISDICTION heading is an exhaustive legal classification of every possible jurisdictional fact in the draft complaint.
• A second respondent, a present legal form, a current entity identity, or a right to merge the action-local name with another institution.
• An admission of conduct, market power, competitive effects, consumer injury, rescission, violation, liability, or wrongdoing.
• That a proposed October order or complaint was final, issued, served, effective, adjudicated, or unchanged before the final November instruments were reviewed.
• A merits finding, admission beyond jurisdictional facts, compliance event, current conduct, or proposition about a separate respondent.
• A shared action, identity, liability, or relationship among IRES, NNEREN, RANW, Williamsburg, and Monmouth.
• That the ended provisions remain effective after November 22, 2016 or that any present policy or practice is unlawful.
• Public data, open data, unrestricted listing access, a public API, or any right outside the order's participant and approved-website framework.
• Completion of a required step, current compliance, monetary relief, or separate conduct or liability by IRES MLS, an owner, manager, website, participant, subscriber, member organization, broker, agent, affiliate, successor, trade association, or person.
• Any exact amendment, notice, website, report, or accessibility calendar deadline without an exact service or finality date.
• That a required act was performed, completed on time, violated, excused, modified, or enforced.
• Current compliance, current website content or accessibility, current entity status, or current order effect.
• That the November 22 issue date or the 061201 URL filename encoding is an exact signing, service, finality, or effective date.
• That any order provision remains effective after the fixed termination date or that any present institution is bound by this historical order.
• Current entity status, policy, conduct, compliance, market power, or the absence of a separate later enforcement, modification, appeal, or other proceeding.
• An exact consent-signing, service, finality, or effective date; the order issue and URL filename dates are not substituted.
• That the five reviewed PDFs are a complete service, enforcement, modification, compliance, appellate, or corporate-status docket.
• Proof that no later proceeding existed, a merits finding, an admission beyond jurisdictional facts, current order effect, present conduct, or compliance.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• An agency merits finding, adjudicated liability, or admission that the competitive or market allegations were true.
• Current policy, current conduct, current market power, current listing treatment, present commission rates, consumer loss, damages, or overcharge.
• Conduct or liability by Metro MLS, any participant, member, broker, agent, website, affiliate, successor, trade association, or person.
• The exact October rescission day, the implementation details of the change, or proof that the policy was absent in every practice after notice.
• Current policy, current compliance, current corporate status, or the absence of any separate later policy or action.
• Conduct or liability by a participant, member, broker, agent, affiliate, successor, trade association, or person.
• An admission of a law violation, non-jurisdictional fact, competitive effect, market power, liability, damages, or wrongdoing.
• An exoneration or finding that the complaint allegations were false; the matter ended by consent without a final merits determination.
• Any current conduct, present policy, current compliance, or proposition about a separate institution or person.
• A final agency finding that the complaint allegations were true, adjudicated liability, or an admission by the respondent.
• That a reason-to-believe threshold is a merits finding, proof standard, or conclusion about a separate FTC matter.
• Current conduct, current market power, consumer damages, or any proposition about an individual.
• That the ended provisions remain effective after March 13, 2018 or that any present policy or practice is unlawful.
• Public data, open data, unrestricted listing access, a public API, or any right outside the order's participant and approved-website framework.
• Completion of any required step, current compliance, monetary relief, or separate conduct or liability by Metro MLS, any participant, member, broker, agent, affiliate, successor, website, or person.
• That the March 13 issue date is an exact service or effective date; finality upon service is stated in the separate consent agreement.
• That any order provision remains effective after the fixed termination date or that any present institution is bound by this historical order.
• Current entity status, policy, conduct, compliance, market power, or the absence of a separate later enforcement, modification, or other proceeding.
• An exact service date, exact effective date, or exact consent-signing date; the March 13 order issue date is not substituted for service.
• That the agreement PDF is a complete service, enforcement, modification, compliance, appellate, or corporate-status docket.
• Proof that no later proceeding existed, a merits finding, an admission beyond jurisdictional facts, current order effect, or present conduct.

What the receipt supports

What it does not establish

• An agency merits adjudication, admitted truth of the non-jurisdictional allegations, or adjudicated liability.
• Current advertising, current offers, current fees, current costs, current consumer outcomes, current compliance, damages, or a property-specific loss.
• Any proposition about multiple listing service access, broker commissions, agent referrals, price fixing, a broader iBuyer market, another institution, or any person.
• An admission of deception, non-jurisdictional facts, consumer loss, damages, law violation, liability, or wrongdoing.
• An exoneration or a finding that the complaint allegations were false.
• Current conduct, current compliance, or conduct or liability by an affiliate, successor, brokerage, multiple listing service, agent, consumer, property, or person.
• That a prohibited representation occurred after order issuance, that the respondent violated the order, or that current compliance was reviewed.
• A rule for every iBuyer, brokerage, portal, multiple listing service, agent, home sale, or property.
• Any finding about commissions, referral payments, price fixing, title services, listing access, market concentration, or a person.
• An exact payment date, a damages calculation, a consumer-loss total, a civil penalty, or an amount received by any particular consumer.
• That the ordered amount equals the later amount sent, cashed, retained, or deposited to the Treasury.
• A merits admission, current violation, current conduct, current financial condition, or liability by another institution or person.
• An exact first-publication date from the two pinned PDFs, a fixed final termination date, or proof that no qualifying later complaint exists.
• Current compliance, current advertising, current service terms, current entity status, or the absence of a later modification or enforcement action.
• A finding that any future conduct violated the order or a proposition about another institution, property, consumer, or person.
• An exact respondent payment date, that every sent payment was received or cashed, or that the sent amount equals the $62,000,000 ordered amount.
• A total consumer-loss or damages measure, an amount attributable to any property or person, or a finding about consumers outside the eligible distribution population.
• Current misconduct, current advertising, current compliance, liability by another institution, or a comparison with any other refund program.